skip to main content
skip to footer
Home
GRE
PRAXIS
TOEIC
TOEFL
ALL PRODUCTS
CONTACT
Login / Register
Close
Products
GRE
PRAXIS
TOEIC
TOEFL
ALL PRODUCTS
TEST TAKERS
I WANT TO:
TAKE A GRADUATE ADMISSIONS TEST
SHOW MY ENGLISH ABILITY
GAIN MY TEACHING LICENSE
PRACTICE FOR A TEST
VIEW ALL ASSESSMENTS
EDUCATORS
I WANT TO:
GAIN MY TEACHING LICENSE
VIEW TEST RESOURCES FOR STUDENTS
READ RESEARCH
INSTITUTIONS
I’M LOOKING FOR:
K12 PROGRAMS
HIGHER EDUCATION
RESEARCH
ETS DATA MANAGER
BUSINESSES
I WANT TO:
COLLABORATE WITH ETS
WORKPLACE LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY
GOVERNMENTS
I WANT TO:
READ POLICY STUDIES
VIEW ALL RESEARCH
CONTACT MY EPN
VISA AND MIGRATION
RESEARCH
I WANT TO:
LEARN ABOUT ETS R&D
FIND A RESEARCH PUBLICATION
LEARN ABOUT INTERNSHIPS AND FELLOWSHIPS
Login / Register
CONTACT
ETS Home
Research & Development
Go Back
Go Back
When Do Standard Approaches for Measuring Vocabulary Difficulty, Syntactic Complexity and Referential Cohesion Yield Biased Estimates of Text Difficulty?
Author(s):
Sheehan, Kathleen M.; Kostin, Irene W.;
Futagi, Yoko
Publication Year:
2009
Source:
Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, p1978-1983
Document Type:
Chapter
Page Count:
6
Subject/Key Words:
Genre,
Readability,
Referential Cohesion,
Syntactic Complexity,
Vocabulary Difficulty,
Automated Scoring and Natural Language Processing,
Educational Applications of Natural Language Processing
Read More
http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2008/pdfs/p1978.pdf