Reliability and the Nonequivalent Groups With Anchor Test Design NEAT
- Author(s):
- Moses, Tim P.; Kim, Sooyeon
- Publication Year:
- 2007
- Report Number:
- RR-07-16
- Source:
- ETS Research Report
- Document Type:
- Report
- Page Count:
- 40
- Subject/Key Words:
- Reliability, Non-Equivalent-Groups Anchor Test (NEAT) Design, Levine Observed-Score Equating, Tucker Equating
Abstract
Ten equating methods were considered: chained linear, chained equipercentile with raw and smoothed frequencies, Tucker, frequency estimation equipercentile with raw and smoothed frequencies, Levine observed using Angoff-estimated and the “correct” reliabilities based on the data generation model used in this study, and Levine true using Angoff-estimated and correct reliabilities. The results were consistent with what is known about equating functions and their variability. Unequal and/or low reliability inflates equating function variability and alters equating functions when population abilities differ.
Read More
- Request Copy (specify title and report number, if any)
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02058.x